Sunday, May 13, 2012

Sasse: Religious organizations or congregations of Christ?


What follows is a selection from a "Circular Letter" Sasse wrote to two Westphalian pastors (Balzer and Linde - Anti Nazi champions). Dcs. Rachel Mumme sleuthed out the document in Germany, and provided the translation. The letter is dated May 27, 1943 and hitherto unknown. The photo is of Pastor Samuel Balzer (1907-1969). Matt H.


It is the belief of our church that there, where the true office [Amt] is, there is also the true congregation [Gemeinde]. Where the office of preaching the Gospel and administering the sacraments [ministerium decendi evangelii et perrigendi sacramenta] is exercised, there the congregation of the saints [congregatio sanctorum] in the sense of AC VII grows with exigency. For “God’s Word cannot be without God’s people.” Where a pious individual expresses his religious experiences, there at best a society of religious individuals gather themselves. This explains the fact that modern Protestantism, despite all efforts to revive and organize the congregational aspect of the church, generated so little true congregational life, and that for example in Berlin, the Catholic Church had many more true congregations, independent of the individuality of the pastor than did the Evangelical Church. 


A true congregation does not gather around people, but rather around the Lord present in His means of grace. Thus the power of the objective preaching of the Gospel to build fellowship! Thus the power of the Sacrament to build true congregational life, a power that can’t be grasped by any rational explanation! Thus the disruptive effect that a false preaching of the Gospel, that a false teaching about Baptism and the Lord’s Supper (there is indeed no administration of the sacraments without a proclamation about them, least of all in the Evangelical Church) has according to the whole experience of modern church history. And if there were nothing else that necessitated us pastors to take our being bound to the confession of the church very seriously, then we would have to be moved by sympathy for the poor congregations who have been ruined because of individualism and subjectivism. They have perhaps taken a mighty upswing under the effects of his glossy eloquence and his tireless drive. But in the meantime they have been made into religious organizations [religiösen Gesellschaften] and have ceased to be congregations of Christ, because that which held them together was no longer the real presence of the Lord, no longer the mystery of the body of Christ [mysterium corporis Christi], rather the ingenuity of a man and the strength of his religion. What appeared to the modern individualistic pastor as a shackle of his personal freedom has proven to be precisely the most powerful protection of the congregation. It is not necessary for the pastor to inform the congregation in his exhortation on the Lord’s Supper [Abendmahlsrede] which more or less obvious hypothesis Professor so-and-so recently drew up about the Sacrament of the Altar. When that happens, it does not actually show respect for the Bible. Today, a great deal gets called respect for the Bible, which in truth is only the very human admiration of a modern exegete. However, what is necessary is that the congregation would be led ever more deeply into the Biblical exegesis of the catechism, which is indeed the confession of the church in its most simple form, one that a seven-year-old child can grasp [S.A. III.12]. One should indeed not believe that this robs the congregation of being able to understand and articulate the teaching of the Bible. Quite the opposite! The experience of the church since the days of the Reformation teaches that the congregation arises thus [via the catechism] and thus alone. This congregation can, as Luther wanted, “judge doctrine” and is capable in the strength of the universal priesthood even to help correct her pastor should he at some time fall into error. Incidentally, what church history also teaches is that the order of the clergy [Pfarrstand] was rich in creative spirits and free thinkers when its being bound to the confession was still a matter of the heart that was simply understood. The sects and the unchurchliness are what flatten people out into a homogeneous mass. In the church of God there is room for diversity. For the gifts of the Holy Spirit are always diverse.


The first task laid upon us by the situation in the church is to strengthen and protect that which still remains of true spiritual office [echtem geistlichen Amt] and of true Christian congregation [echter christlicher Geminde] in Germany, as far as we men are charged with such. May God help us to this end in the strength of the Creator Spirit [Creator Spiritus], for whose coming we pray this week.


Friday, May 11, 2012

Kleinig on Sasse on Preaching the Gospel


At a conference for pastors in Australia a paper was given on preaching. The discussion which followed focused on whether it was always necessary to preach both law and gospel in every sermon. A seminary professor declared, rather vehemently, that he always preached about the gospel in every sermon. At this Sasse got up, shuffled to the microphone and stunned the audience by saying:

'Never in all my life have I preached about the gospel in any sermon. And I will never preach about the gospel as long as I live. I have always and will always proclaim the gospel'.

That for me sums up Sasse's understanding of the gospel. The gospel was, for him, always an enactment, a performative utterance. And so, even though he often taught as he preached, he always spoke in such a way that Christ spoke through him to grant forgiveness and all his gifts to the faithful.

John Kleinig, "Sasse on Worship"

Monday, May 7, 2012

Walther's Theses on Church and Office


In commemoration of the day of C.F.W. Walther, confessor, here are my revisions of the translation of Walther's theses on the church and the office of the ministry (Kirche und Amt). M.H.

The Theses
Part One
Concerning the Church

Thesis I
The church in the proper [eigentlichen] sense of the term is the congregation [Gemeinde] of saints, that is, the entirety [Gesamtheit] of all those who, called out of the lost and condemned human race by the Holy Spirit through the Word, truly believe in Christ and by faith are sanctified and incorporated in Christ.

Thesis II
To the church in the proper[1] sense [eigentlichen Sinne] of the term belongs no wicked person, no hypocrite, no unregenerate [individual and] no heretic.

Thesis III
The church in the proper sense of the word is invisible [unsichtbar].

Thesis IV
It is to this true church of believers and saints that Christ gave the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and it is the proper and only possessor [Inhaberin] and bearer [Trägerin] of the spiritual, divine, and heavenly gifts, rights, authority [Gewalten], offices [Aemter], and the like that Christ has procured and are found in His church.

Thesis V
Though the true church in the proper sense of the term is essentially [Wesen] invisible, its presence [Vorhandensein] can nevertheless be definitively recognized, namely, by the marks of the pure preaching of God’s Word and the administration of the sacraments according to Christ’s institution.

Thesis VI
In an improper sense Scripture also calls the visible entirety [Gesamptheit] of all the called, that is, of all who confess and adhere to the proclaimed Word and use the holy sacraments, which consists of good and evil [persons], “church” (the universal [catholic] church); so also it calls its several divisions, that is, the congregations [Gemeinden] that are found here and there, in which the Word of God is preached and the holy sacraments are administered, “churches” (Partikularkirchen [particular or individual churches]).[2] This it does especially because in this visible assembly [Haufen] the invisible, true, and properly so-called church of believers, saints, and children of God is hidden; outside this assembly [Haufen] of the called no elect are to be sought.

Thesis VII
As visible fellowships [Gemeinschaften] that still have the Word and the sacraments essentially according to God’s Word bear the name church [Kirche] because of the true invisible church of genuine believers that is found in them, so also they possess the authority [Gewalt] that Christ has given to His whole church, on account of the true invisible church hidden in them, even if there were only two or three [believers].

Thesis VIII
Although God gathers for Himself a holy church of elect also where His Word is not taught in its complete purity and the sacraments are not administered altogether according to the institution of Jesus Christ, if only God’s Word and the sacraments are not denied entirely but both essentially [wesentlich] remain, nevertheless, every believer must, at the peril of losing his salvation, flee all false teachers, avoid all heterodox congregations [Gemeinden] or sects, and acknowledge and adhere to orthodox congregations [Gemeinden] and their orthodox preachers [Predigern] wherever such may be found.

A. Also in heterodox and heretical churches [Gemeinden] there are children of God, and also there the true church [Kirche] is made manifest by the pure Word and the sacraments that still remain.

B. Every believer for the sake of his salvation must flee all false teachers, and avoid fellowship [Gemeinschaft] with heterodox congregations [Gemeinden] or sects.

C. Every Christian for the sake of his salvation is in duty bound to confess [bekennen] and adhere to orthodox congregations [Gemeinden] and orthodox preachers [Predigern], wherever he can find such.

Thesis IX
To obtain salvation, only fellowship [Gemeinschaft] in the invisible church, to which alone all the glorious promises regarding the church were originally given, is absolutely necessary.

Part Two

Concerning the Holy Preaching Office [Predigtamt] or the Pastoral Office [Pfarramt]

Thesis I
The holy preaching office [Predigtamt] or parish pastoral office [Pfarramt][3] is an office distinct from the office of priest [Priesteramt], which all believers have.

Thesis II
The preaching office [Predigtamt] or the parish pastoral office [Pfarramt] is not a human institution [menschliche ordnung] but an office [Amt] that God Himself has established.

Thesis III
The preaching office [Predigtamt] is not an optional  office [Amt] but one whose establishment has been commanded [geboten] to the church and to which the church is ordinarily [ordentlicherweise] bound till the end of time.

Thesis IV
       The preaching office [Predigtamt] is not a special state in opposition to or holier than that of ordinary Christians, as was the Levitical priesthood, it is rather an office of  service [Amt des Dienstes].

Thesis V
The preaching office [Predigtamt] has the authority [Gewalt][4] to preach the Gospel and administer the holy sacraments as well as the authority [Gewalt] of spiritual judgment.

Thesis VI
A. The preaching office [Predigtamt] is conferred [übertragen] by God through the congregation [Gemeinden] as the possessor [Inhaberin] of all ecclesiastical authority [Kirchengewalt], or the power of the keys, by means of its call, which God Himself has prescribed. B. The ordination of those men called by the laying on of hands [Handauflegung] is not a divine institution, but rather an apostolic, ecclesiastical rite [Ordnung], and only a solemn public confirmation [Bestätigung] of that call.

Thesis VII
The preaching office [Predigtamt] is the authority [Gewalt], conferred [übertragene] by God through the congregation [Gemeinde] as the possessor of the priesthood and all church authority [Kirchengewalt], to exercise the rights of the spiritual priesthood in public office in behalf of the congregation [von Gemeinschafts wegen].

Thesis VIII
The preaching office [Predigtamt] is the highest office in the church, and from it flow all other offices in the church.
Thesis IX
[A.] To the preaching office [Predigtamt] there is due respect as well as unconditional obedience when the preacher [Prediger] uses God’s Word. [B.] The preacher has no [domineering] rule in the church [hat… keine Herrschaft]. He has no right [Recht] to introduce new laws or arbitrarily to establish adiaphora or ceremonies [Mitteldinge und Ceremonien] in the church. [C.] The preacher [Prediger] has no right to inflict and carry out excommunication alone, without the preceeding knowledge of the whole congregation [Gemeinde].

Thesis X
To the preaching office [Predigtamt], according to divine right, belongs also the duty [Amt] to judge doctrine, but laymen also possess this right. Therefore, in the ecclesiastical courts [Kirchengerichten] and councils they are accorded both a seat and vote together with the preachers [Predigern].


[1] The use of the technical terms “proper” and “improper” can easily mislead and confuse. They are simply classic linguistic catagories used by Walther (following the orthodox dogmaticians) to distinguish and explain the varying specific definitions and use of terms, and have nothing to do with any moral judgement. Spade quotes Medieval scholar Walther Burley [1275-1344/45]: “‘By its first division, supposition is divided into proper and improper supposition. Supposition is proper when a term supposits for something for which it is permitted to supposit literally. Supposition is improper when a term supposits for something by transumption or from its usage in speech.’ Improper supposition therefore is the kind of supposition or reference a term has when it is used figuratively and not literally.” Emphasis M.H. Paul Vincent Spade, Thoughts, Words and Things: An Introduction to Late Medieval Logic and Semantic Theory (2001), p. 250. M.H.
[2] The Catechism of the Catholic Church retains what has no doubt been the consistent meaning of this term since before the Reformation. Walther’s use of course is absent the idea of any apostolic succession or episcopacy in the Roman Catholic sense.  “The phrase ‘particular church,’ which is first of all the diocese (or epiarchy) refers to a community of the Christian faithful in communion of faith and sacraments with their bishop ordained in apostolic succession. These particular churches “are constituted after the model of the universal Church; it is in these and formed out of them that the one and unique Catholic Church exists.’” The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed. (1997), p. 221. M.H.
[3] “This concrete preaching office [Predigtamt] instituted by Christ for the church is for Luther directly connected to a parish [Parochie]. It is a parish pastoral office [Pfarramt], that is, an office with a circumstribed parish [Pfarrbezirk]…” Helmut Lieberg, Amt und Ordination bei Luther und Melanchthon, (Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecth 1962), p. 110. M.H.
[4] I have chosen throughout the book to render Gewalt more as “authority” than “power.” “Power” tends to communicate autonomy which “authority” fits better with the conferral of the office and its responsibilities by God. Luther also has at his disposal and uses the term “power” with reference to the office of the ministry. Says Luther, the congregation should not look upon the particular charactoristics of the their pastor but “pay attention to this mandate [Befehl]. That every one whois called to the preaching office [Predigtamt], has the power [Macht] and authority [Gewalt] to preach, baptize, absolve, and they should recognize that such an office [Ampt] is not of men, but of the Lord Christ.” WA 28.470.38ff., quoted in Lieberg p. 122. M.H.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Sasse: "The greatness of the Church of Jesus Christ does not depend upon the many zeros"


Thank God, there still are Lutheran Churches that do not join in this theology of the “as though,” churches in which one is still aware of what is meant by the prayer which the Church of Jesus Christ offers daily for its preservation in the true doctrine and in the right use of the sacraments. They are called to the rescue of the vanishing Lutheranism of large church bodies, swamped with unionism and syncretism, to help by their intercession, by their brotherly admonition, by their example. They are to help as Christians should help one another in such matters: without a trace of Pharisaic superiority, in love toward the brethren for whom Christ has died, humbling themselves in consciousness of a common guilt.


These churches (as a rule they are the smallest and poorest ones, to which the temptations of secularism have not yet come so near)  have  a special function to perform. They are the ones who, on the basis of their own spiritual experiences, have something to say to the larger bodies, namely that it is not the millions that make a church strong and give it power over the minds, but He alone who is present wherever two or three are gathered together in His name. They are the ones who must tell a world Lutheranism which is striving for unity that the uniting of churches is not a process of addition by which one brings together everything that with more or less justification claims the name of Lutheran. It is process of integration which lets it appear clearly just what a Lutheran Church can be. The arithmetic of God is different from that of men. The greatness of the Church of Jesus Christ does not depend upon the many zeros which make such an impression upon our human eye.


Sasse, Letters to Lutheran Pastors IX.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Sasse: "The Church dare never cease to pray 'Lord Keep us Steadfast in Your Word.'


When by the end of the first century Gnosticism entered the Church and entire sections of earliest Christendom, like Syria and Egypt, were alienated by it, when paganism in the guise of an allegedly purer, more spiritual type of Christianity invaded the Church and gained what may well have been a majority of Christians for its views, then the Church of the true faith gathered around creeds that confessed the Incarnation. And it was the Apostle of Love, John, who used this confession to exclude these heresies from the Church. Although this involved men who certainly also believed in Jesus, who only sought to do Him greater honor by denying the fleshly reality of His body, yet he dared to designate them as false prophets, yes, as anti‑Christs, and even to deny his Christians the right to bid them God‑speed (1 John 4:1ff.; 2 John 7ff.). And so one might continue in the history of doctrine. The gathering of the true Church and the elimination of heresy, that was the objective of all the great doctrinal pronouncements of the Ancient Church as well as of the Reformation.


And, as is usually the case in this world of sin, truth and error are not easy to distinguish, the difficulty increasing in the same degrees as it is a higher truth that is at stake. Whether lone Jeremiah, foretelling the doom of Jerusalem, was sent by God, or whether it was the other prophets who were proclaiming the wonderful deliverance of the city, but whom Jeremiah was characterizing as lying prophets,—who in Jerusalem could tell this with certainty at that time? It was a matter of faith, of a false faith in a so‑called Word of God, or of true faith in the genuine Word of God. To recognize the true Word of God and to accept it in faith, that is, according to the testimony of the New Testament, a gift of the Holy Spirit. But a true understanding of Scripture is also achieved only by the help of the Holy Spirit. For in this world where the “Father of Lies” seeks to deceive men, even the true word of God is subject to false interpretation.


Therefore the Church dare never cease to pray: “Lord, keep us steadfast in Thy Word”; “Lord, keep us in Thy Truth.” It knows that it does not ask this in vain. For someone else is praying with and for the church; the merciful High Priest who in His last night on earth prayed for His Church, not only that it might be one, but that it might be one in the truth (John 17:17): “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” Upon this prayer of Jesus Christ, and upon this alone, rests our assurance that in spite of the fallibility of men and the capacity of Christians for being led into error, the Church cannot lose the truth if it continues in the Word and recognizes nothing but the Word alone.

Sasse, Letters to Lutheran Pastors II, Dec. 1948

Saturday, April 28, 2012

When will men stop this idle talk about “dead orthodoxy.”


What better source for instruction concerning the nature of the Church’s confession can we find than the New Testament? Here we at once make an extremely important observation, namely that the same words which correspond with our “confess” and the Latin confiteri, the words homologein and exhomologeisthai, have several distinct meanings which nevertheless are basically related: the confessing of sin (1 John 1:9, Matt. 3:6, James 5:16), the confessing of faith (Matt. 10:32, John 9:22; Rom. 10:9; 1 John 2:23; 4:2; Phil. 2:11, etc.; cf. 2 Cor. 9:13; Heb. 3:1; 4:14, etc.) and the praising of God (e. g., Matt. 11:25; Rom. 14:11).


In the Church all three types of “confessing” belong inseparably together, even as history shows. The “Te Deum laudamus, Te Dominum confitemur,” which Luther loved to count as one of the ecumenical confessions of the Church,[1] was sung by a church that was repenting for the sins of mankind amidst the ruins of the ancient world. The Confessiones of Augustine are praises of God, but also confessions of faith and confessions of the sin in his life. Because the Reformation began as a penitential movement and according to its innermost nature was such a movement in fact, a movement that concerned itself about true repentance and the justification of sinners, therefore, and only therefore, it was able to produce confessions of faith and to sing a new song of praise to God in its liturgies and hymns. Paul Gerhardt[2] and the other great hymn writers of our church could sing the praise of God as no other generation. But it was not in spite, but rather because of the fact that they were orthodox men and contenders for orthodoxy.


It is no mere coincidence that the end of the seventeenth century, when men were no longer taking the doctrine of faith seriously, also witnessed the departure of the confessional from Lutheran churches and at the same time the silencing of its great hymns of praise and thanksgiving. When will men stop this idle talk about “dead orthodoxy,” a charge that is completely without historical foundation, resting only on a dogma of Pietism,—for Pietism has also had its dogmas, and some very obvious ones at that. This connection between confession of sins, confession of faith, and the praise of God could be demonstrated as occurring in other denominations as well, e.g., in the Catholic Church of the Middle Ages, whose great theologians were also great liturgists, or in the Eastern Church where “orthodoxy” has always meant both the true doctrine and the true praise of God.


Nevertheless, it would be entirely wrong to proceed from this connection to the conclusion which is so often drawn today, namely that it is enough if the Church worships God with glorious hymns and liturgies, and that the Creed is only a part of the Liturgy. Many modern Protestants are perfectly willing to join in singing those old hymns of praise which glorify the Incarnation of the eternal Son of God or the divine mystery of the Trinity. But that does not yet mean that they accept these respective articles of faith as true. In addition to their liturgical function, therefore, these Creeds have another side, according to which they serve as formulations of doctrine. And this dare not be surrendered. In Heaven this confession will indeed be purely an act of praise (Phil. 2:11, also the great hymns of the Apocalypse). For in heaven there will be no more error, no more heresies. And Anti‑christ, who leads men into misbelief and unbelief, will finally be overcome.


But here on earth the praise of God with its implied confession of belief in Him is accompanied by a declaring of the content of this faith, of simple judgment of fact, of articles of faith which the believer holds to be true. “Born of the Virgin Mary,” “of one essence with the Father,”—those are statements that one cannot pray and cannot sing unless one believes them to be true, even as one should not sing, “Blest and Holy Trinity, Praise forever be to Thee!” if one no longer believes this doctrine. The fact that modern Protestants do this nevertheless is a symptom of the decline of the evangelical churches and explains the greater strength of Catholicism. There is no church on earth without a real confession that it takes seriously. The Liturgy itself is an outgrowth of such a confession, and the Pope was perfectly right when in his encyclical Mediator Dei he reminded the liturgical movement of the Roman Church that the familiar dictum “Lex supplicandi lex credendi” [the law of praying is the law of believing, i.e., what is prayed is believed] not only can but must be inverted. Just as it is certain that in the history of the Church a dogma is usually first prayed and then defined as an article of faith, just so certainly the liturgy is preceded by confession of faith in the original Church.

Sasse Letters to Lutheran Pastors II, Church and Confession, translated by M.C. Harrison



[1] LW 34.199 MH

[2] 1607-76, Greatest German Lutheran Hymnwriter. Studied theology at Wittenberg. Pastor at St. Nikolaikirche in Berlin 1651. Resigned his post in 1666 because he refused to submit to syncretist edicts of the Elector of Brandenberg. The push for union between Lutherans and Reformed was being made in Brandenberg well before it was accomplished by Frederick Wilhlem III! See ODCC p. 667. MH

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Sasse to Bishop Hans Meiser on a compromised Erlangen theological faculty


Sasse had a falling out with his Bavarian Lutheran Church Bishop, anti-Nazi hero Hans Meiser, and the following letter tells us why. If Sasse's critique sounds shrill to some, it must be recalled that the Erlangen faculty formally gave up subscription to the Lutheran Confessions circa 1970, barely 20 years after Sasse vociferously complained of a theologian with Reformed views on the sacrament joining the faculty. 

Pastor H.





Prof. D. Hermann Sasse                                                            Erlangen, 11 February 1948
                                                                                                Rathsberger Str. 4[1]

Honorable Herr Landesbischof!


As I hear, Professor Stauffer has the call to the New Testament chair in our faculty, which means the territorial church in the agreement with the state gave its prior approval. I of course never thought that my individual vote would have any affect on the calling of colleague Stauffer. The territorial church raised no objection against the calling of an ordinarius [full professor] to the Erlangen faculty, who in his published writings, rejects the confessionally defined doctrine of the Evangelical Lutheran Church regarding the sacraments of baptism and the Lord’s Supper. This has necessary consequences for me. If the church allows one of its teachers, in spite of his oath of ordination and office, to fall into false teaching, then it can certainly be said that the hope that the church would find its way through [these challenging times] is lost. If the church is silent when its pastors proclaim a Reformed doctrine of the sacraments, then it can excuse them for not knowing better, since in their studies they were given no opportunity to learn the Lutheran doctrine. And when the church tolerates, without protest, the calling of a teacher, who teaches baptism and the Supper in a Calvinistic fashion, then it declares that it is fundamentally prepared to tolerate these doctrines. Then the church itself makes any doctrinal discipline impossible. Then it excludes the re-establishment of discipline in the administration of the Lord’s Supper in its realm. Then it can not work for the resurrection of the confessionally faithful Evangelical Lutheran Church. Then, fundamentally, fellowship in the Lord’s Supper with the Reformed is established. Then also the “United Evangelical Lutheran Church” is a church, in which the ecclesiastical boundaries have been given up, which according to our confessions separate the true catholic, orthodox church in the sense of the New Testament from the fanatical sects [schwaermerischen Sekten].


I know, highly honored Herr Landesbischof, what terrible burdens now rest upon you and upon your advisors. It is not in any way my intention to try to increase these burdens without necessity. I understand that you and the church council could render no other decision than that which was made. That you had to so act, is the result of a long development, which you did not begin, and for which your predecessors in office bear the final responsibility. I know also that you had done what is within your power, to impede this development. But you will understand, when I declare to you that I can not remain in a church, which – for whatever respectable and pressing reasons – not only tolerates a doctrine of the sacraments which is expressis verbis rejected by the confession of the Lutheran Church as false doctrine, but also sanctions such doctrine. Let the territorial church council be clear on this one thing – quite irrespective of any other concerns: Precisely the v i r t u a l real presence taught by Stauffer in his last Bavarian lecture is expressly rejected in the Formula of Concord (which has legal standing in our church). Stauffer’s teaching can not exist within the church as a possible interpretation of Augustana X. What move I shall now make (hindered for the moment by my departure for the USA) I shall communicate to you [in time]. However, it is now impossible for me to remain within the theological faculty of Erlangen. I once joined this faculty under the presupposition that despite all human and theological weakness and inadequacy, it would remain Lutheran, in accord with its founding, and according to its constitution, which is legally recognized by the state. And thus it possesses the right of ordination to the office of the ministry of the Lutheran Church. I remind you that it is precisely my obligation to be concerned for the maintenance of the Lutheran character of the faculty (I assumed this concern upon joining the faculty), which provokes me and requires me, as a matter of conscience, to register my opposition. I have nothing against the colleagues nor against Stauffer, and I would heartily plead with you, honorable Herr Landesbischof, to take action against the hearsay which will eventually result. As my relationship to the faculty is now dissolved, whether I be placed extra facultatem (as the Reformed professor[s who have taught at Erlangen in the past][2] ), or whether I be retired, will have to be resolved. I do not know therefore whether I should ask you in this matter (which is certainly a matter of the church), to begin an informational discussion with the appertaining authorities, the State’s Ministerium for Instruction and Religion. In any case it is incumbent upon me to order everything in such a way that the church and faculty be spared unnecessary turmoil.

With the expression of my sincere respect
                                                            Your very humble,
                                                                                    Hermann Sasse


[1] Trans. MH.

[2] There is probably an intended irony here. Green notes that while none of the full faculty members at Erlangen were Nazis, there were two men “loosely connected with faculty” who were in fact Nazis. They were Wilhelm Vollrath, an instructor for practical theology, and Paul Sprenger, the professor of Reformed theology. Lowell Green, Lutherans Against Hitler: The Untold Story, St. Louis: CPH 2007, p. 51. MH

Homily at the LCMS IC for World Malaria Day


Pray TODAY - World Malaria Day

Luther: "Where His Word is not preached, then it is not His house."

And he was afraid, and said, How dreadful is this place! This is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven. Genesis 28.17

Learn from this that God's house does not mean a splendid great building, as we have them. God does not ask if the house is big, vaulted or consecrated. He does indeed live there, even though He has never ever built a house. What does this mean, then, for God to live in a house? It means only this: that God is there with his Word. Where the Word is, there God will certainly live, and where the Word is not, there God will not live, even if a house were to be built for Him that was as big as it possibly could be. Where His Word is not preached, then it is not His house, even if we built church after church. A church can only have value if God's Word is preached in it.

Martin Luther
WA 24.497b.

Monday, April 23, 2012

I'm Pleased to Be Part of This Effort


Former government officials join religious leaders in conscience fight


Former U.S. ambassadors to the Vatican Jim Nicholson, who represented President George W. Bush at the Vatican from 2001 to 2005, and Raymond Flynn, who served under President Bill Clinton 1993-97, are pictured in 2007 and 2005 photos. The two have joined with other leaders in Conscience Cause, a new organization committed to overturning the Department of Health and Human Services' inclusion of contraceptives and sterilization among mandated preventive services for women under the new health reform law. (CNS file photos/Paul Haring and Gregory L. Tracy, The Pilot)
Posted: 3/23/2012
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- Former U.S. ambassadors to the Vatican who represented both Democratic and Republican presidents have joined in a new effort to support federal legislation reaffirming constitutional rights to religious liberty and freedom of conscience.

Ambassadors Raymond Flynn, who served under President Bill Clinton from 1993 to 1997, and Jim Nicholson, who represented President George W. Bush at the Vatican 2001-05, are among the religious leaders and former government officials involved in Conscience Cause, an organization committed to overturning the Department of Health and Human Services' inclusion of contraceptives and sterilization among mandated preventive services for women under the new health reform law.

"This is the most serious attack on our human, constitutional and religious rights that I have ever heard of," Flynn told Catholic News Service in a telephone interview March 12. "All Americans concerned about freedom and the protection of our religious values must speak out and get involved in this critical debate."

Flynn, who also was mayor of Boston from 1984 to 1993, said he expects to travel around the country on behalf of Conscience Cause, giving speeches in favor of action by Congress to reverse the HHS mandate.

"We are all committed to doing whatever we can to protect human rights and the conscience rights of all people, not just Catholics," he said.

The group also includes religious leaders such as the Rev. Matthew Harrison, president of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod; the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference; Rabbi Meir Yaakov Solovelchik, associate rabbi of Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun in New York; and the Rev. Joe Watkins, pastor of Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church in Philadelphia.

In addition to Flynn and Nicholson, former government officials involved with Conscience Cause include ex-Bush advisers Ed Gillespie and Mary Matalin and former Rep. Bill Paxon, a Republican who represented New York state from 1993 to 1999 and chaired the National Republican Congressional Committee.

Flynn said Catholics have lost much of the political influence they wielded 25 years ago or more.

"At one time Catholics were very involved not just in church, but in the union movement and politics and their community," he said. But following the election of Jack Kennedy as the nation's first Catholic president, he added, Catholics got complacent and "as a result when other people become more active, we slip back." http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?ID=14463